All privacy_test and privacy_provider_test classes:
- Namespaced with component\privacy.
- Fixed incorrect use statements with leading backslash.
- Changed code to point to global scope when needed.
- Renamed a few files to make all be privacy_test or privacy_provider_test.php
- All them passing individually.
- Complete runs passing too.
Some characters will be encoded for display in HTML which will affect
the process of JS evaluation. For example, the ` => ` sequence used for
fat-arrow syntax will be set as `=>` in the HTML source.
To process the JS the innerText must be used instead.
A new setting, $CFG->setsitepresetduringinstall, has been added to
config file, to let admins define the site admin preset to be applied
during the Moodle installation.
Besides, a new parameter, "--sitepreset" has been also added
to admin/cli/install.php, to let define it too when running the
upgrade process using CLI.
These are the only cases 100% safe to apply the renaming of the
testcase class names to match the file names.
All other cases are not safe, because they are missing namespace
and may enter into name conflicts. Adding namespaces is not as
simple as imagined because it implies to, also, add a good number
of modifications to core. See the issue for more details.
Because of more moodle.css contents, the total size of the privacy
exports has grown over the allowed size. Just raise it a little bit
more.
Note this commit isn't a problem caused exclusively by this issue,
but as far as this also contributed to the size increase, assigning
the fix to it.
Before this patch the exported users (to csv file that jmeter consumes)
were all the enrolled users in the test course. And that's ok when the
number of users enrolled match the number of concurrent threads planned
for a jmeter plan (each thread is a user).
But when both numbers don't match, that can lead to the jmeter plan
not behaving as expected, because it iterates over the excessive users
in the file, leading to some users having run 5 loops, others 4...
The only way to make results more consistent is to, always, ensure that
the number of users exported for the plan match the plan size and not
the site size.
And that's what this issue exactly does, restrict the export to the
number of threads that the plan will have. So every user always runs
the very same number of loops.
Note that this issue is not the one causing this problem alone
but just one more causing the download limits to be surpassed.
Allowing 1000 more bytes to have some margin, as far as we are
adding lots of new css stuff here and there.
